Bob jones policy on interracial dating
reveal a bias toward the people of God who stand unapologetically for the Lord Jesus Christ and His Word? But the same can be said about race: You’re born black, but the decision to date a white person is on you. But Bob Jones drew the same distinction between racism and opposing interracial marriage: Is Bob Jones University guilty of racism because it has a rule restricting interracial dating? For there to be discrimination, one race would have to be treated differently than the other.Is it an attempt to marginalize, by caricature, Christians who are out of step with an age that is out of joint? Students of all races attend here and live in racial harmony and respect for one another as Christians. The real problem here is that such a bending of the First Amendment to accommodate discrimination is so arbitrary.
Bob Jones University opposes one world, one church, one economy, one military, one race, and unisex.Most recently, it arose in an exchange before the Supreme Court in the Obergefell vs. After that decision, the IRS commissioner said the agency would not target the tax-exempt status of religious institutions that oppose gay marriage.It’s taken two-and-a-half years for BJU to accomplish the reorganization because it used a complicated plan to split its organization into two entities with the university falling under the umbrella of its elementary school’s existing non-profit status to achieve its own, according to university statements and organization documents filed with the South Carolina Secretary of State and the IRS.In his first meeting with the university’s Cabinet, Pettit said he believed it was appropriate for BJU to seek its tax-exempt status because the university doesn’t believe the positions it once held about race.Pettit called the university’s racist policies a social issue that was not biblical.“The Bible is very clear,” Pettit said as he announced the change to the university Wednesday night.Do Christians still have the right under the Constitution to believe and practice their faith even when their faith is out of sync with an ecumenical, antichrist, federal public policy? Can you really determine who has a valid religious belief and who is just using religion as an excuse to discriminate? -Trebuchet A week after offering this defense of its policy, Bob Jones dropped the policy.
The resemblance between Bob Jones’ argument and Jindal’s argument raises a simple question: Does the right to practice a religious belief against gay marriage differ fundamentally from the right to practice a religious belief against interracial marriage? But the question remains: If religious freedom protects your right to discriminate privately between same-sex and opposite-sex relationships, does it also protect your right to discriminate privately between same-race and opposite-race relationships? As Bob Jones put it: “Does a Christian consensus have to exist to make a belief right?
…You may favor protecting traditional marriage between one man and one woman, or you may favor making gay marriage legal.
If we did a poll on those issues in this room, we would certainly find a variety of views.
God made racial differences as He made sexual differences.
The First Amendment gives Bob Jones University the freedom to create policies and guidelines under which we operate. Everyone has the right under the Constitution to believe and practice his faith even when his faith may be out of sync with another's belief. People are entitled to religious freedom even when their “views on sin are in direct conflict with the culture.” 4. Empirically, all the evidence runs against this belief.
“We are made of one blood.”Bob Jones University lost its tax exemption after a 13-year battle with the IRS over whether the university’s policies against interracial dating precluded it as a non-taxable religious educational institution.