Can carbon dating faked
Over time this will change and the amount of organic carbon will decrease to be replaced by oxidizable carbon at a linear rate.
What follows is 33 independent reasons not to believe in creationism: Evidence for a minimum age of 10 thousand years.Instead, KC was dated by applying known patterns of plant growth to a single organism that self-reproduces by "cloning".Oxidizable carbon ratio dating is a method for determining the absolute age of charcoal samples with relative accuracy.The oldest plant alive has been dated back as far as 11,700 years (7367 years too old) and is called King Clone.King Clone's age is not precise to a given year, as it wasn't dated by dendrochronology proper (counting rings).Some of these reported ages have indeed been revised based on new evidence (sometimes larger, sometimes smaller), but never to the orders of magnitude required by YEC.
Moreover, these dating methods are not mutually exclusive: where their range, accuracy, and applicability overlap, the dates they produce agree with each other.
When one of these minerals is heated, the trapped electrons are discharged and produce light, and that light can be measured and compared with the level of surrounding radiation to establish the amount of time that has passed since the material was last heated (and its trapped electrons were last released).
Although this technique can date objects up to approximately 230,000 years ago, is only accurate on objects 300 to 10,000 years in age.
Thermoluminescence dating is a method for determining the age of objects containing crystalline minerals, such as ceramics or lava.
These materials contain electrons that have been released from their atoms by ambient radiation, but have become trapped by imperfections in the mineral's structure.
Even dates derived from individual trees contradict the recent-creation doctrine, since the oldest trees pre-date the supposed global flood.